A practical example with Tips: The National Museum

This section illustrates how the Narratives module can be used to structure content for the web using the approach By Association. The end result is essentially the same with the Hierarchical approach.

As we've seen, both methods have their pros and cons and you will need to decide which best suits your collection's needs. Keep in mind that as you explore the module and understand how it works, you may well find another method for presenting your content on the web: it is a particularly flexible and versatile module!

Our approach is first to look at how the content is presented on the website and then to examine how it was managed in EMu using the By Association approach.

This example uses our fictional website, The National Museum:

The Muesum's Collections

For the National Museum collection four Types were found to be sufficient to organize the various narratives for presentation on the website. These are:

  • Master
  • Theme
  • Category
  • Story

As we've seen these are categories to which we assign individual narratives, organizing them into logical groupings.

The Types are in a broad hierarchical arrangement starting with a unique Master narrative at the highest level that presents the collection as a whole. In this example, the master narrative is called The Museum's Collections:

Narratives

The ThemeType in our example is a broad departmental or discipline description, such as:

  • Fine Art & Sculpture
  • Science & Technology
  • Zoology
  • History of Music

The next level of grouping is the Category, a more narrow collection of narratives. In our example the Zoology Theme has six categories:

  • Marine Invertebrates
  • Fish
  • Mammals
  • Reptiles
  • Insects
  • Dinosaurs

The lowest level of our four Types is the Story, a discrete narrative about some thing (object in the collection) or collection of things (related objects).

It is important to keep in mind that although we have four Types, we are not limited to four levels in our hierarchy. Any single branch could have many more than four. Or less. As we've seen, the Type mainly serves to group narratives: how narratives are displayed on the website is determined by the relationships we establish between individual narratives (regardless of their Type). How you associate narratives will depend on the needs of your collection.

For instance, the History of Music narrative has a Type of Theme. If we only had a few discrete narratives relating to this theme, we might give them a Type of Story and associate this History of Music narrative directly with them (i.e. without any intermediary grouping narratives with a CategoryType).

However, the Insects narrative, which also has a Type of Theme, could have a narrative for each of the 29 Orders of Insects. Each of these would have a CategoryType. Some of these might point to further groupings of narratives (which would also have a CategoryType) and so on. Eventually a Category narrative will point to narratives with a StoryType and the journey through this branch of the collection will come to an end.

Note: It's worth stressing again that the depth of any branch of your hierarchy is determined by the relationships made from one narrative to another, not the narratives' Type.

Example: The National Museum website